No hay artículos en el carro
No hay artículos en el carroLisa C
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 18 de junio de 2021
This product is reliable and a high quality tool. It arrived fast and exactly as expected.
Robert M.
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 9 de diciembre de 2021
Fluke makes a good thermometer. I use this to take [pipe temperatures, motor temps, etc. The thermocouple is useful to use to check temperature sensor drywell fittings to verify that the temp sender is working properly.
Volker Hansen
Comentado en Alemania el 10 de julio de 2019
Das Infrarotthermometer von Fluke ist einfach zu bedienen und robust. Es lässt sich ein Thermoelement anschließen, so dass es sehr vielseitig einsetzbar ist. Top Qualität....
Michael Fenton
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 17 de julio de 2016
This is a great device with great features. I first bought the 62 Max+ version but I realized I didn't have anything to take thermocouple contact measurements with. Instead of buying a device specifically to take contact measurements, I decided to upgrade to the 568. The 561 seems like a great unit too and is about $200 cheaper but the accuracy on the thermocouple is +/- 4 degrees F. With the 568 the thermocouple accuracy is +/- 2 degrees. The emissivity setting on the 561 only has a low (30), medium (70), and high (95) setting. The 568 has emissivity settings from 10-100 in increments of 1. Additionally, the memory feature is very handy when measuring HVAC splits or when you want to periodically measure the same thing over time to track any changes. The menu system on this device is also very easy to use and makes a lot of sense. One thing I didn't like about the 62 Max+ is the menu is designed in a manner that doesn't make much sense. When scrolling through min/max/average/differential, the 62 Max+ then takes you through the set up menu so you have to scroll through 7 additional setting screens to get back to the min/max/average/differential screens.The 568 shows min and max or average and differential at the same time. This unit is a little pricy but that is what you get with Fluke if you want their best products. The 566 is around $55 less than the 568 with similar specs but fewer features and with a 30:1 spot ratio instead of the 50:1 spot ratio of the 568 and the 561 has a 12:1 spot ratio. The 566 would have probably been all I need but for the price difference of only $55 I decided to go with the 568. In my limited experience with these devices, a 12:1 spot ratio should be sufficient for most uses, however a 30:1 or 50:1 spot ratio makes it that much more convenient because you can be further away and get a more accurate result. I'm new to Fluke products but one thing you want with any measuring device is accuracy and I have tested my Fluke 376 FC clamp meter and now the Fluke 568 IR thermometer and both appear to be very accurate so I have confidence that I'm getting accurate results and Fluke seems to be living up to their reputation for accuracy. This device comes with a very nice plastic hard case and a K type thermocouple and usb cable for connecting to your PC.
Cameron
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 13 de enero de 2015
I chose this Infrared Thermometer because Fluke is a great brand, and I have not been disappointed. The Thermometer works like a charm and it is simple to change the settings. I have found it to be fairly accurate even at long distances. This model is more expensive that others available, but this one has much better resolution and accuracy. The case is also a great feature. It holds not only the thermometer but also the book, batteries, etc. This allows for easy storage and travel.
Productos recomendados